Re: Perl 6 modules plan
[email protected] (Kirrily Robert) Sat, 11 Aug 2001 14:31:47 -0400
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.stdlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ask wrote: >On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Kirrily Robert wrote: > >[...] >> =head2 The role of CPAN >> >> Will CPAN's role remain unchanged? Will there be a separate space for >> Perl 6 modules (6PAN)? >> >> If we do want to make changes to CPAN then Perl 6 gives us an >> opportunity for a "flag day" if we need one. OK, not an actually flag >> *day*, but at least a point where we can say "Things are different for >> Perl 6" and to hell with backwards compatibility ;) > >Eh, that doesn't sound like something we want to do for quite a few >years. What makes you say that? I can imagine a number of scenarios in which we decide to do things differently for Perl 6, which could mean that lots of Perl 5 modules don't come across cleanly and must be rewritten. One very simple example is if we required each module to have $VERSION. K. -- Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [email protected] - http://infotrope.net/ "You look like a bucket of shit." "You think that's bad, someone accused me of being a country and western singer earlier today." -- Sharkey, Benno (from the Netizen quotes file)