Re: More 6PAN musings: local namespaces

On Monday 17 June 2002 11:49, [email protected] wrote:
> I think 6PAN should be split in several common SDK with good/thought in
> advance hierarcy (+ easy to install non-interactive SDK-install), but the
> rest should be free to use...
>
> So it can be a bare-bone-Perl + several SDK's easy to dload and install....

That idea, as you may know, has come up quite a few times. It's been seen 
that trying to create a big one-size-fits-all SDK doesn't work (which is not 
what you're suggesting, I just wanted to get that idea out of the way).

Several small, domain-specific SDKs would imho be a good idea indeed. I know 
that there was talk about doing this amongst the XML community. Imho a good 
way to get there would be for domain-specific groups (SIGs in fact) to come 
up with their own SDKs. I don't think they need to be coordinated between 
themselves as the good ideas will spread quickly.

-- 
Robin Berjon <[email protected]> -- for hire: http://robin.berjon.com/
  Prediction is very difficult, especially of the future.
  -- Niels Bohr