Re: boo-boo in run docs?

On 11/6/25 4:44 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> What I object to is mainly assertions that the reference-style
> documentation is incomplete

Proc is missing exitcode, command, mulitimethod, pid,
exitcode, and signal from its OOP declaration at
the top of the page.

They are all part of Pro's structure.  Putting it
up with the rest tells me to go looking for them
somewhere below.  Not putting them there tells
me they are not in the documentation and I do
not look for  them.

And yes, I can be a pain-in-the-neck sometimes.