Re: Candidates for FAQ removal

[email protected] ((Peter Scott))
Newsgroups perl.perlfaq.workers
Organization Pacific Systems Design Technologies
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In article <291220020235132007%[email protected]>,
 [email protected] (_brian_d_foy) writes:
>some people have nominated these answers for removal from the
>perlfaq.  comments either way are appreciated.  i won't remove
>them in the absence of comments though, so speak up if you think
>they have lived their lives well enough to retire.
>
>9.0: What is socket.ph and where do I get it?
>
>4.17: Does Perl have a Year 2000 problem?  Is Perl Y2K compliant?

Ditch 'em.

Don't be shy about proposing other candidates, either :-)

-- 
Peter Scott
http://www.perldebugged.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.