Re: [DOC PATCH] teach perlfaq1 about 5.10
[email protected] ("David Nicol") Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:43:33 -0600
| Newsgroups | perl.perlfaq.workers,perl.perl5.porters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Dec 13, 2007 2:29 AM, Nicholas Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 03:37:49PM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > Paul Johnson wrote: > > > Questions: > > > > > > - Do we want to try to predict when Perl 6 will (or will not) be > > > released? Am I accurate, or at least not inaccurate? > > > > I think, given our past wild inaccuracies about Perl 6 predictions (ie. the > > "by Christmas" running gag), that we should pull any predictions and simply > > say what we know: that there is no release date for Perl 6 and Perl 5 will > > continue to be supported well after its release. > > It is useful, or is it marketing/advocacy to explain why? That Perl 6, like > any open source project, determines when to release based on readiness, rather > than some compromise between the desires of engineering and marketing > departments. > > [I don't feel that I phrased that as well as it could be phrased] > > Nicholas Clark > -There is no Perl 6 for the next couple of years. Stay tuned, but don't - worry that you'll have to change major versions of Perl soon (i.e. before -2008). + Perl 6, as an open source project driven by volunteers, determines when + to release based on readiness rather than on a drunken compromise + between the engineering and marketing departments.