Re: Pod POD pod poD pOd or P.O.D.

[email protected] (Russ Allbery)
Newsgroups perl.pod-people
Organization The Eyrie
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ricardo SIGNES <[email protected]> writes:

> I am not clear on whether this paragraph says or means much:
>
>   Throughout this document, "Pod" has been the preferred spelling for
>   the name of the documentation format. One may also use "POD" or
>   "pod". For the documentation that is (typically) in the Pod format,
>   you may use "pod", or "Pod", or "POD". Understanding these
>   distinctions is useful; but obsessing over how to spell them,
>   usually is not.
>
> So: the format is POD, Pod or pod, but a document is the pod, Pod, or
> POD?

I have always referred to it as POD, and all of my POD utilities and all
of their documentation have always done so as well.  I apparently never
noticed that bit.

> Is it trying to say that all three are always acceptable and not to
> worry about it?

That would be my preference.  Other parts of Perl documentation (such as
perlsyn) use Pod, POD, and pod interchangeably right now.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([email protected])             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.