Re: X<> vs. X<< >>

Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
> 
> I keep telling myself that I am the *only* person who is interested in the idea
> of restructuring perlpodspec to be more... structured. 

Nah, certainly not the first, just the most recent in a series of us. I 
mean, perlpodspec itself was written with that very thought in mind, 
back when the definition of Pod was "whatever perldoc parses".

> I remind myself that if
> I skip it, I can go play Mario Kart... so far, so good.

Most of us end up writing our own special-purpose variant or extension 
of Pod. I'm not sure if that's preferable to Mario Kart.

Allison