Re: deprecating L<"Section">

On Dec 1, 2009, at 10:46 AM, Nicholas Clark wrote:

>> Gosh, I didn't know Pod-Simple included those.  I'd much prefer it be core, to
>> keep the reference separate from an implementation.  (I wouldn't object to
>> Pod-Spec, but I don't think we want to give core one more thing to sync up.)
> 
> Core doesn't mind, as long as there's an answer.
> 
> (The revised layout of ext, dist and cpan makes this a lot easier. Whilst said
> files *are* currently under pod/ they don't have to stay there. I believe that
> I can patch it so that the core's build automatically grabs them from the
> appropriate dist dropped into cpan/, and which point it's just as easy to keep
> canonical as every other directory in cpan/)

So are you saying that it should remain in the Pod::Simple distribution?

Best,

David