Re: deprecating L<"Section">

On Dec 1, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Nicholas Clark wrote:

> No, I'm saying that giving "core one more thing to sync up" is not an issue
> that should affect the decision making.
> 
> I don't have an opinion on where the right place *is*. I'm perfectly happy for
> it to be in distributions on CPAN, if that's the right place.
> 
> Although I note (without investigating)
> 
> http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/blob/HEAD:/Porting/Maintainers.pl#l1295
> 
> 	# XXX these two files correspond to similar ones in blead under
> 	# pod/, but the blead ones have newer changes, and also seem to
> 	# have been in blead a long time. I'm going to assume then that
> 	# the blead versions of these two files are authoritative - DAPM
> 	'EXCLUDED'	=> [ qw( lib/perlpod.pod lib/perlpodspec.pod ) ],
> 
> 
> so where ever it *does* end up, it looks like there are forks to heal, to get
> back to one true document.

Jesus Christ.

I don't think they should be in Pod::Simple. So I'd like to remove them. Anyone else have any opinions? Allison? HDP? RJBS? TorgoX?

Best,

David