Re: XHTML formatter 'xhtml' regions
[email protected] (Ricardo Signes)
| Newsgroups | perl.pod-people |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* "David E. Wheeler" <[email protected]> [2009-12-11T14:02:33] > I asked Graham earlier this week if he'd consider switching to > Pod::Simple::XHTML, and his comment was that, if we did that, and someone had > invalid html in a `=for html` section, it would make the whole document > invalid. Of course, we were both working on the assumption that `=for html` > stuff would be passed through unmolested. > > I'm not sure it should be. I mean, it'd be easiest to do so, but another > choice might be to parse it and fix validation issues. I think it's way out of scope to validate here. I think it's totally reasonable to make sure there's a hook for doing so. > But at any rate, the current implementation of escaping the content seems > wrong to me. If I wanted that, I'd use a verbatim block. David and I spoke on AIM. This is 99.99% a regression introduced in October! I will fix it. -- rjbs