Re: SPEC UPDATE: [rt.cpan.org #55602] Bug #12239 was a mistake
[email protected] (Ricardo Signes)
| Newsgroups | perl.pod-people |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* "David E. Wheeler" <[email protected]> [2010-04-20T13:35:11] > On Apr 20, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote: > > > I'd really like to get the "perldoc command broken" into 5.12.1, and I > > think we'll have the best chance of that if the delta to the new version is > > as small as possible. Can we do 3.14 just for that (and the already-fixed > > warnings) and then 3.15 ASAP with further improvements? > > Does it really matter? 5.12.1 won't pull in the full 3.14 release anyway, > just the regression. Does it matter whether or not it's released with any > fixes before it goes to maint? That is not what I'd expect. I would not guess that Jesse wants a subset of changes, getting us a dual-lived module with no corresponding CPAN release and a version number that was never available elsewhere. I could be wrong. I will ask him if he's around, today. -- rjbs