RE: SPEC UPDATE: [rt.cpan.org #55602] Bug #12239 was a mistake

[email protected] ("Jan Dubois")
Newsgroups perl.pod-people
Organization ActiveState Software Inc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
>
> > I'd really like to get the "perldoc command broken" into 5.12.1, and
> > I think we'll have the best chance of that if the delta to the new
> > version is as small as possible. Can we do 3.14 just for that (and
> > the already-fixed warnings) and then 3.15 ASAP with further
> > improvements?
>
> Does it really matter? 5.12.1 won't pull in the full 3.14 release
> anyway, just the regression. Does it matter whether or not it's
> released with any fixes before it goes to maint?

Yes, it does matter:

1) CPAN modules bundled in Perl releases are supposed to have a matching
   CPAN release.  Exceptions are meant for emergencies only.

2) It makes the job of the core committer a lot easier if they can just
   upgrade the module in its entirety without having to manually extract
   a minimal patch.

Cheers,
-Jan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.