RE: SPEC UPDATE: [rt.cpan.org #55602] Bug #12239 was a mistake
[email protected] ("Jan Dubois")
| Newsgroups | perl.pod-people |
|---|---|
| Organization | ActiveState Software Inc |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Apr 20, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote: > > > I'd really like to get the "perldoc command broken" into 5.12.1, and > > I think we'll have the best chance of that if the delta to the new > > version is as small as possible. Can we do 3.14 just for that (and > > the already-fixed warnings) and then 3.15 ASAP with further > > improvements? > > Does it really matter? 5.12.1 won't pull in the full 3.14 release > anyway, just the regression. Does it matter whether or not it's > released with any fixes before it goes to maint? Yes, it does matter: 1) CPAN modules bundled in Perl releases are supposed to have a matching CPAN release. Exceptions are meant for emergencies only. 2) It makes the job of the core committer a lot easier if they can just upgrade the module in its entirety without having to manually extract a minimal patch. Cheers, -Jan