Re: no deprecation warning for L<section>

On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:57:01PM +0200, Marek Rouchal wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> sorry to say so: yes, I am alive, but no, I have no spare time to
> seriously drive the refactoring of Pod::Checker (or podchecker) to use
> Pod::Simple. But I wanted to state that anyone who wants to go that
> way has my blessing and I am standing by for eventual questions.
> I am not sure whether Pod::Simple's API allows for the level of fine-
> grained control that Pod::Parser offered to actually detect the issues,
> rather than silently ignoring (or making up for) them.

From what I remember it's relatively easy to flag up errors or warnings.

Some of the internal code is a bit... interesting, though.

Michael