Re: Pod::Html's cross referencing of C<> links

>
> My guess is that it's just plain wrong, so no wonder it's confusing.
> Perhaps it's reflecting an early design, or perhaps it's just a typo, and L
> was meant instead of C.  L<> can link to =items provided they are of a type
> that permits that.  Currently, the only ones that are are ones that are in
> what html calls definition lists, at least in Pod::Html.
>

I do not think it would be a typo for it is repeated in several cases
(unless it was a typo in a find/replace all, I suppose). Whatever the
reason, could you rephrase your last sentence? I feel that it will shed some
light on something I am not grasping, but currently it is rather difficult
to understand.