Re: Z<> in =item
[email protected] (Shawn H Corey)
| Newsgroups | perl.pod-people |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11-06-25 11:53 PM, Karl Williamson wrote: > In perldiag.pod, there is a line like this > > =item Z<>500 Server error > > All the other items form a definition list. My guess is that this is to > make sure that the 500 isn't mistaken for a numbered =item in the list. > However, with html, anyway, I don't see any difference in the output > with and without the Z<>, and podchecker ignores the Z<> and says that > the list has mismatched item types. > > Can someone explain? Originally, these are the only valid =item's: =item * =item 1 =item 1. =item definition These are invalid but frequency occur: =item * bulleted? =item 1 numbered? =item 1. numbered? They all should be treated as a definition but seldom are. That means, an `=item Z<> anything` should be treated like a definition. -- Just my 0.00000002 million dollars worth, Shawn Confusion is the first step of understanding. Programming is as much about organization and communication as it is about coding. The secret to great software: Fail early & often. Eliminate software piracy: use only FLOSS.