Re: GSoC Status Update
[email protected] (Michael Stevens)
| Newsgroups | perl.pod-people |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:35:21PM -0400, Marc Green wrote: > Howdy, > > The only thing left to do with regards to Pod::Html is to have it reviewed > (available athttps://github.com/marcgreen/perl/blob/gsoc-pod/ext/Pod-Html/lib/Pod/Html.pm<%20https://github.com/marcgreen/perl/blob/gsoc-pod/ext/Pod-Html/lib/Pod/Html.pm>if > any of you would like to). Once that is done, that is, once all > comments, > suggestions, and warnings are considered and possibly acted upon, it will be > ready to be merged into the core. > > I am happy to announce that I have made much progress on porting > Pod::Checker this week. I have made a list of all the errors that > Pod::Simple already checks for, and by comparing that to what Pod::Checker > additionally checks for, I can efficiently implement the rest. So that is > what I have been doing. There is a minor snag in one of the error checks, > the one that warns if there is any text after a =pod directive, because > Pod::Simple does not offer any way to access said text. To overcome this I > am adding such a feature to Pod::Simple::Blackbox, so I should resume > porting the error checks shortly. When I looked at this before I found there tended to be significant disagreement over whether the Pod::Checker checks were actually good checks that ought to be included in Pod::Simple. I know this is opening a huge can of worms but I'd be interested if you could post the list of checks you're adding to Pod::Simple. Michael