Re: Possible patch to Test::Pod

On Jun 7, 2012, at 6:33 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote:

> So, maybe we'll say "well, this warning is not fatal for a year, by which time
> you should really have gotten around to this."  Except only x% of authors will,
> and then we're back to a bunch of breakage, and this argument again about
> whether we extend the grace period or allow the test failures to break those
> modules that were otherwise so stable that they needed no fixes in the last
> year.

Yeah, I don’t want to do that. Yech.

> DBI is already fixed.  Dancer releases frequently already, so the notion that
> we're forcing them to "rush out a new release" doesn't seem too troublesome.

+1

David