Re: Assume CP1252

On Jan 13, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Karl Williamson <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Nice. So should we then adopt the same pattern as the HTML 5 spec?
> 
> I'm still leery of overruling an =encoding line, especially if we have no provision for telling us to not overrule.  But it means that it's fine to s/latin1/cp1252 when there is no =encoding, as far as I'm concerned, and I haven't heard any dissent from that here.  If you like, I can prepare a patch for that; the EBCDIC portion is a little tricky. Are you going to release a version of this module without this change?

Yes, planning that now. Also announcing deprecation of support for Perls < 5.6 in the following release.

>> And I wonder if that W3 spec issue you pointed to the other day could use a comment to this effect.
> 
> I don't understand you here.  This is a W3 website document, and we can't edit it.  I

Oh, sorry, I was misremembering this link as a bug report.

  http://www.w3.org/TR/newline

Never mind.

David