Re: Pod::Simple output as POD
[email protected] (Karl Williamson) Fri, 13 May 2016 12:03:28 -0600
| Newsgroups | perl.pod-people |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05/11/2016 07:38 PM, John SJ Anderson wrote: > >> On May 11, 2016, at 17:52, Ron Savage <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 12/05/16 10:39, David E. Wheeler wrote: >> >>> Which also seems a little weird. Maybe Pod::Simple::PodFormat? >> >> Pod::Simple::ExtractPod is good, but possible is Pod::Simple::JustPod. > > With only a _tiny_ bit of my tongue in my cheek, I’ll throw out Pod::Simple::PlainOldPOD ... > > 8^) > > j. > I'm leaning towards Pod::Simple::JustPod. I think that captures the essence, and seems to me to fit the paradigm of the output format. If we wanted to be cute, we could call it Pod::Simple::SimplyPod, with you know, only one, natural, ingredient, and no harmful additives.