Re: POD formatter version comments

[email protected] (Shawn H Corey) Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:52:29 -0400
Newsgroups perl.pod-people
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--------------0ViINUGKPmJjJhEIUwaNI0C8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 2024-03-15 14:38, Russ Allbery wrote:
> If you would be happy with a PR to remove that bullet point, we're just
> vigorously agreeing.  πŸ™‚  Otherwise, I'm not sure what you're asking for
> instead.

I guess I wasn't clear. I was talking about making the requirement an 
option for the formatters. When the user runs a formatter, they can 
specify an option to include the info in their output. In other words, 
move it from a requirement to an optional implementation for a formatter.

-- 
π‘†π’‰π’‚π’˜π’ 𝐻 πΆπ’π’“π’†π’š πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

--------------0ViINUGKPmJjJhEIUwaNI0C8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2024-03-15 14:38, Russ Allbery
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:[email protected]">
      <pre>If you would be happy with a PR to remove that bullet point, we're just
vigorously agreeing.  πŸ™‚  Otherwise, I'm not sure what you're asking for
instead.</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    I guess I wasn't clear. I was talking about making the requirement
    an option for the formatters. When the user runs a formatter, they
    can specify an option to include the info in their output. In other
    words, move it from a requirement to an optional implementation for
    a formatter.<br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
π‘†π’‰π’‚π’˜π’ 𝐻 πΆπ’π’“π’†π’š πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦</pre>
  </body>
</html>

--------------0ViINUGKPmJjJhEIUwaNI0C8--