Re: Status?

At 8:34 PM +0000 1/12/04, Tim Bunce wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:05:42PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>>  At 12:57 PM -0500 1/12/04, Josh Wilmes wrote:
>>  >What's the current state of ponie at this point?  Are there any areas where
>>  >assistance is needed?
>>  >
>>  >I'm sure i'm not the only one who would like to see some non-trivial code
>>  >running on parrot sooner rather than later.
>>
>>  Define "non-trivial" here. (Would 168K of bytecode, with ncurses and
>>  postgres interfaces, count?)
>
>Of course.

You've not seen DecisionPlus. :)

>But [email protected] has been very quiet. There doesn't seem to
>be a community of developers or much visible effort to create one.

Last I knew, this was more of an announcement list until Arthur had 
things in a state where multiple people could reasonably work on the 
code. Whether that's a good or bad idea, well... not going there. 
(It's been a day to avoid things for me, I see) His use.perl status 
reports, or more frequent and rougher notes, would be handy to have 
here, though.
-- 
                                         Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[email protected]                         have teddy bears and even
                                       teddy bears get drunk