Re: make install
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) Mon, 4 Oct 2004 11:02:17 -0400
| Newsgroups | perl.ponie.dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <a06110403bd87165cf25d@[10.0.1.5]> |
At 10:34 AM -0400 10/4/04, Andy Dougherty wrote: >On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote: > >> At 10:08 PM +0100 10/3/04, Nicholas Clark wrote: >> >On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 10:11:34PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: >> >> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, Nicholas Clark wrote: >> >> >> >> > parrot has had a make install target for quite a while, which >> >>seems to work. >> >> >> >> That's surprising -- At one time I thought I had hardwired the ICU data >> >> directory to the build directory as a "temporary" measure to >>get things at >> >> least sort-of working. Perhaps someone's done it correctly since. > >> >> Does it really work even if the build directory is gone? > >> >ponie really worked if installed, but ponie is currently only using >> >parrot's data structure code. I doubt that it's going anywhere near ICU > >> If Parrot even started then it worked out. If the data directory's >> not there, things die on startup. > >I really don't see how it could possibly work. Are you *sure* you moved >the build directory out of the way? Are you *sure* you don't have the >environment variable PARROT_ICU_DATA_DIR set pointing somewhere? Can run >truss (or trace or whatever it's called on your system) and verify it >really is picking up the installed icu directories? It's also possible that the build used a system-installed ICU, in which case you're fine no matter what. -- Dan --------------------------------------it's like this------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [email protected] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk