Re: Preliminary test coverage analysis

In article <[email protected]>, "schwern"
<[email protected]> wrote:

Going back eight months, this was the state of things.  Schwern had just added
coverage analysis to Test::Harness:

> - A bit less than half of all the core libraries have no coverage at all.
> 
> Some very important things are not covered: AutoSplit, CPAN, Cwd,
> Data::Dumper, MakeMaker, Pod::Html, Pod::Man and Term::ReadLine.

We're aware of most of these, and most of them still don't have tests.  (I'm
trying, I'm trying!)
 
> - Of those covered, a smidge less than half have < 75% statement coverage. - "
>    "      "   , 20% have < 50% statement coverage.
 
Is it possible to get an update on this?  Writing a new test from scratch is
generally harder than adding to an existing test.  (It's probably the blank page
thing that plagues authors.)

If we can identify some spots that need ~ 30 minutes/25 lines of attention, I
can bang on the "get involved, you lazy bums" drum and try to find some new
people.

-- c