Re: Anyone want Test::Class::Moose?
[email protected] (Ovid)
| Newsgroups | perl.qa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>________________________________ > From: chromatic <[email protected]> >> Is there anything you would change? > >I don't *love* maintaining individual driver files (t/subsystem/feature.t), >but I do like being able to run test classes individually with: > > $ prove -l t/subsystem/feature.t > >Is that easy to support? Shouldn't be too hard. Maybe have a DEMOLISH which checks to see if the tests have been run and run them with a default (empty) constructor if they haven't. Cheers, Ovid -- Twitter - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl/ Buy my book - http://bit.ly/beginning_perl Buy my other book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Live and work overseas - http://www.overseas-exile.com/