Re: Anyone want Test::Class::Moose?
[email protected] (Ovid)
| Newsgroups | perl.qa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Justin, This is something I've wondered as well. Several times when people asked me about using Test::Class with Moose I pointed them to Test::Able, though I confess I never used that code. Invariably they would not choose it. I think what's going on is the interface. It looks "different" and that's possibly scaring people off. The interface for Test::Class::Moose looks very similar to Test::Class and that might make for easier adoption if I ever do enough to get it out of alpha. Please note that I'm not saying that what I've written is better! However, the comfort level of the Test::Class::Moose interface may be appealing to some. Cheers, Ovid -- Twitter - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl/ Buy my book - http://bit.ly/beginning_perl Buy my other book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Live and work overseas - http://www.overseas-exile.com/ >________________________________ > From: Justin DeVuyst <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Friday, 14 December 2012, 19:54 >Subject: Re: Anyone want Test::Class::Moose? > >All, > >What's wrong with Test::Able? > >-jdv > > >