Re: [ESSAY] “Writing tests, motherfucker! ”

[email protected]
Newsgroups perl.qa
Message-ID <OF473D05A8.2B9FFB8D-ONC1257B03.00316FAE-C1257B03.003270F1@[email protected]>
Hello there,
You should consider the aim of the tests.
Whether it is for UAT (user acceptance) for a new functionality.
Or just Sanity Tests :
=> Non regressions tests
But if it is automated, I totally agree : please just write the damn tests 
;-))
Note that they should be normally written/designed before development by 
the functional teams ...
Which is rarely the case.
Best regards
Fabien


From:   Shlomi Fish <[email protected]>
To:     Jeffrey Ryan Thalhammer <[email protected]>, 
Cc:     [email protected]
Date:   30/01/2013 07:58
Subject:        Re: [ESSAY] “Writing tests, motherfucker!”



Hi Jeffrey,

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:36:54 -0800
Jeffrey Ryan Thalhammer <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On Jan 26, 2013, at 1:13 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> 
> > However, now I feel that trying to
> > philosophise about the distinction between all those is not so useful 
for
> > the people who are actually trying to write the tests.
> 
> 
> +1000
> 

:-)

> I once had fervent debates with colleagues about whether something was a
> "unit test" or "integration test" or "acceptance test".  I always felt 
the
> distinction was pointless, but now I understand why it happened.
> 
> Unit tests were regarded as the developer's realm.  Integration tests 
are the
> build engineer's responsibility.  And acceptance tests might belong to 
QA.
> So labeling tests serves as a means for allocating work (and blame).
> 
> Fortunately, I've seen more and more organizations dismantle their QA 
teams
> completely.  Quality is everyone's responsibility.

Well, I feel that having some testers who try to break the software is 
useful
for programs which have a GUI, a web UI, etc. They don't need to be coders
per-ce, but should be clueful to try various things. I am always 
frustrated
that various web UIs don't behave exactly like I want, and I feel that
contacting the web-site owner will yield nothing. (Google, I am looking at
you).

As someone who is obsessed with even the smallest usability details on
http://www.shlomifish.org/ and other sites, I feel that the standard “You 
have
a problem with a site, and I agree with you that it's a problem, but I'm 
not
going to make it a high priority to fix it, so f**k you!” (as opposed to 
what
Joel on Software said here -
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/customerservice.html .


> 
> Now, somebody, just write the damn test :)
> 

Agreed. :-).

> -Jeff

Regards,

                 Shlomi Fish

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish       http://www.shlomifish.org/
Stop Using MSIE - http://www.shlomifish.org/no-ie/

My Commodore 64 is suffering from slowness and insufficiency of memory, 
and its
display device is grievously short of pixels.  Can anybody help?
    — Omer Zak

Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.