Re: interest in converting LWP / Mech hierarchy to roles?

On 02/28/2013 10:45 AM, Andy Lester wrote:
> 
> On Feb 27, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Mark Stosberg <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> Then you have the WWW::Mechanize sub-classes. Here's a sampling:
>>
>>    Test::WWW::Mechanize
> 
> As far as Test::WWW::Mechanize goes, I don't see that the testingness is
> really a role.  It's really mostly a bunch of wrappers and some
> convenience functions.

Thanks for the feedback, Andy.

I'd like to have a Mechanize that has both the testing functions, and
also JavaScript support, which the WWW::Scripter sub-class has.

I haven't looked closely into it, but the surface it seems like I should
be to combine a "does testing" role with a "does javascript" role to
achieve this result.

   Mark