Re: interest in converting LWP / Mech hierarchy to roles?

On 13-02-28 09:07 AM, Yanick Champoux wrote:
> On 13-02-27 11:04 AM, Mark Stosberg wrote:
>> Perhaps if some of these get converted to extend-by-roles instead of
>> extend-by-inheritance, some others will follow along, and we'll end up
>> with a more useful of collection of Perl-based browser extensions.
>
>      I don't have a lot to add to the conversation at the moment, but I
> just wanted to '++' the idea

Same here. I've had two separate projects at university that both would 
have been easier had the LWP stuff been done as roles. As it seems 
everyone thinks this is probably a good idea, the real question becomes 
"Who is going to do the work?" -- as usual :)

-Mike