Re: Post-install tests demo at the qa hackathon \o/
[email protected] (Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯)
| Newsgroups | perl.qa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is great news, I know a few people who wanted this for a long time. I'm not coming for this hackathon, so please publish slides and discussion notes afterwards. On the scale between proof-of-concept and production-ready, where does your code fall? So far, have any considerations been made for packaging, and if yes, how does it compare with the established Ruby → RPM conventions? <http://paste.scsys.co.uk/240986?tx=on> Will the code the merged into main M::B? If not, can it be renamed to ::InstallTests for better discoverability?
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJRZmBfAAoJEGvjX9bn75YlGqAP/1NTwGIyWBCKeJMnRqgP54UZ ZcMDuMVWwqqV9X+FqrRSOBuj0xxtQlDqWXjUZn4BOh+R+0d1FywJiriOaiz9p/pT BdUBO9ubwN91aHGVf/kBJ5x/fsjkrBvbJqJzYLBZdmB/x6dmW8QaCAqNfxfgWvqY 0rWHEwDm9b7rjY1nTqeq+wkV123SDSrfGG9Zho8DTqwcG/E7on5Nnd+mVtHAlpuB wwinMx/iI0JHfjAZCNIip+csdIhPRvhpzp6TrCRnaynzK3UxlsboVWGnQgyYV+H6 l1Uosbt1kGesk9XAPA6t9DwmyqtHfAcTOw55vB2pkLgwN1mCQYNPgYNCXR4Kxw2V ke4LN/pA1DMz6YT3oprBnwjMrQtL1iuuH9Ci+M+mvd2VBs8GVQr0icyJhKXUIK6i qf+xydBXVOHN3kZJeymx9pQxQKswslB+7+jN/IghF3vvOtPDgeCwPhiUekMGEAWB RYPAddxpMOvRhDXAq3amp/u74qEDQct4QQqov94g0A7CepIFNaTVHi9QeDNb2iZb 7MWzZ5PYYMijtuAoJeFAZ9W6xp2Lanvv1rv2wS0IuLbHOo2nllcb9Qyu9m9J3LLi t/e/SnNg+l/iUV9KDib5XfPuEvOZ6DjfTE4LiuRH8MziQqfpSah5fzhTB/aBOYwN C+ioiRSaJN1HtK3a+6m2 =7C9Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----