Re: TAP::Harness and -w

[email protected] (Ricardo Signes) Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:44:34 -0400

Newsgroups	perl.qa
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

* Leon Timmermans <[email protected]> [2013-07-04T14:04:21]
> By what process? Define consensus? Given Andy is the official
> maintainer and Ovid is the effective maintainer, I don't think they
> need our consensus a priori.

06perms.txt says:

  Test::Harness,ANDYA,m
  Test::Harness,MSCHWERN,c
  Test::Harness,OVID,c

So presumably at least getting the three of them to agree on some kind of
resolution process is a start.

-- 
rjbs

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 490 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR1d6yAAoJEOYby6cMccU54LEIALx85Tp1G5hhTZ4VQObL45Vo
j711DUwrahQoGMmFKOvAJ07e9tGG4ikRy1d7aaqxog+f6M28CJT0U5ktP2mjVKfJ
kU7WquCkuvOuTIvKwpiypvmOJPlO3C6GmRwlTlME67ON6c0fLwMBbdxTgAS3Nxg2
HctPAtBRdMs5Uxvp8edHl0Xh1p5N7gglb2cFBlaB1o91x2aCyy4PLmrrV8h6ART2
iNkeYdDcHJqQqdaIG8FB/wTWsLdzf3Uv7XjCNpyjHYrmFOq6UFTrq7IGuzEOe9+2
JRwNlgbZS/viii/EYkEJtSoCRUngNgMV4W/4wsFtCasBvzRwglXpnve8J3XhALU=
=wZ5n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----