Re: TAP::Harness and -w

----- Original Message -----

> From: Ricardo Signes <[email protected]>
> 
> * Leon Timmermans <[email protected]> [2013-07-04T14:04:21]
>>  By what process? Define consensus? Given Andy is the official
>>  maintainer and Ovid is the effective maintainer, I don't think they
>>  need our consensus a priori.
> 
> 06perms.txt says:
> 
>   Test::Harness,ANDYA,m
>   Test::Harness,MSCHWERN,c
>   Test::Harness,OVID,c
> 
> So presumably at least getting the three of them to agree on some kind of
> resolution process is a start.


I'm winding up with astonishingly little bandwidth due to launching our company, so I was hoping to see a strong consensus from the users. I would also love to see examples of where the change or lack thereof is causing an issue. I am SWAMPED with so much email that receiving many opinions piecemeal makes it hard for me to follow along.

Were I not so bandwidth-constrained, this would be less of an issue, but I'd like to see a good Wiki page or something with the pro/con arguments laid out. If this is too much, I should turn over maintainership to someone with more bandwidth to ensure I'm not a blocker.
 
Cheers,
Ovid
--
IT consulting, training, international recruiting
       http://www.allaroundtheworld.fr/.
Buy my book! - http://bit.ly/beginning_perl
Live and work overseas - http://www.overseas-exile.com/