CPAN::Changes::Spec

[email protected] (Lars Dɪᴇᴄᴋᴏᴡ 迪拉斯) Tue, 23 Jul 2013 19:19:44 +0200

Newsgroups	perl.qa
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Since CCS0 (spec, not module) is about to go into core
<https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=118959>, and this
becomes canonicalised as best practice, I'd like to know which
considerations went into the design of the spec as I have the feeling
that it's not as good as it could be.

Especially, how does it compare to prior art, e.g. the formats
described or used by Debian, specfiles, LTjake, hex, hanekomu,
rgiersig, rsavage or cdolan? How does a user extend the format, taking
advantage of the machine readable aspect, to add metadata using the
vocabulary established by ascope?

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 836 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
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=N3Ju
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----