Re: TAP::Harness and -w
[email protected] (Ricardo Signes) Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:17:45 -0400
| Newsgroups | perl.qa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Ovid <[email protected]> [2013-09-18T04:19:28] > As I said in my previous email on July 7th: backwards-incompatible changes to > the backwards-compatibility layer (Test::Harness) are not a good idea. The > proper response is to have people impacted by this issue switch to > TAP::Harness, as was suggested several years ago when Test::Harness 3.0 was > released. It looks like Module::Build already has use_tap_harness. So what's suggested is a patch to ExtUtils::MM_Any to switch from Test::Harness to TAP::Harness...? -- rjbs
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 490 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSOjSZAAoJEOYby6cMccU5lY8H/2SKakL8lOG7lrD1Aro8bvF4 zYZ8lw+cSw7xVDh9erJ3zYvX32b1tDVEJgmaJGoUrXhR8wrwLWoRO5ptjD/gqQTS YI4uFCuCQ4M00MpJj6zDrJMF+8OWlK7mjM6+uwNuUDAS9cPUkjcAYYtibmupqfEv 3wxubo/yKjMgCHJG5hNYSO5kY4Q8O5bnBat2J0HkCZRzDQXv/AQBJFlBqEJK4hn7 B33a6e11BoWXJE6qp3LyilPKSnd9gUnabiWpX1ByyrUDgKrFIMRt7egQGOwd17+l gz5vpwbZ2F8omovml+lBvgsFoQEaBSFQSitc4CVlSKtytSQW1BCoUqLK/NI0YdY= =f+dM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----