Re: anyone want to adopt Test::Tester?
[email protected] (Fergal Daly) Fri, 27 Jun 2014 23:06:24 +0900
| Newsgroups | perl.qa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALqwHtYQ=C-ZSrzxRZ+S6x6=wedbgXisCCqAV3bpQLCb2Ai8DA@mail.gmail.com> |
On 27 June 2014 11:50, Fergal Daly <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27 June 2014 07:18, Ricardo Signes <[email protected]> wrote: >> * David Cantrell <[email protected]> [2014-06-26T09:19:00] >>> I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these days - >>> and it's distributed with Test::Builder, so incompatibilities should >>> never* happen. >> >> Test::Tester is really nice and easy to use. >> >> Test::Builder::Tester is awful and often requires that you predict the exact >> TAP that will be printed. >> >> I always recommend Test::Tester. > > :) > >> Fergal, if no one replies, I can take over simply to shepherd patches and make >> releases. > > Thanks Ricardo and Karen. > > Chad (who is making the changes in Test::Builder) has offered to take > it over and possibly bundle it with TB which would be nice and make it > easier for people to choose it. > > I'll give him the keys to the house shortly, Done. Thanks again, F > F > >> -- >> rjbs