Re: Last call for review of Test-Builder using Test2 (Formerly Test-Stream)
[email protected] (Kent Fredric) Sat, 6 Feb 2016 23:13:33 +1300
| Newsgroups | perl.qa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAATnKFCXFj7sxwP9nG4_u9bS80DkXYxSK4JfHMJt6kgEpSCV9A@mail.gmail.com> |
On 6 February 2016 at 08:14, Chad Granum <[email protected]> wrote: > If there is anything in these > distributions (Test2 in particular) that makes you uncomfortable, you > need to speak now. Mentioning here for visibility: As with Test-Stream where the apparent silence lead to a premature conclusion that finalisation was appropriate, I feel interpreting the current lull in activity in the same way equally premature. I've seen a proposal floating around that might raise our ability to be confident about the feature set of Test2 before requiring its implementation/feature-freeze. Just the people who I talked to who implied they were going to present said proposal haven't yet had the tuits to do so yet. -- Kent KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL