Re: Last call for review of Test-Builder using Test2 (Formerly Test-Stream)

[email protected] (Kent Fredric) Sat, 6 Feb 2016 23:13:33 +1300
Newsgroups perl.qa
Message-ID <CAATnKFCXFj7sxwP9nG4_u9bS80DkXYxSK4JfHMJt6kgEpSCV9A@mail.gmail.com>
On 6 February 2016 at 08:14, Chad Granum <[email protected]> wrote:
> If there is anything in these
> distributions (Test2 in particular) that makes you uncomfortable, you
> need to speak now.


Mentioning here for visibility:

As with Test-Stream where the apparent silence lead to a premature
conclusion that finalisation was appropriate, I feel interpreting the
current lull in activity in the same way equally premature.

I've seen a proposal floating around that might raise our ability to
be confident about the feature set of Test2 before requiring its
implementation/feature-freeze.

Just the people who I talked to who implied they were going to present
said proposal haven't yet had the tuits to do so yet.


-- 
Kent

KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL