Re: AnyEvent mode?

On Don 02.12.2010 19:04, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:37, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe we can make another benchmark AnyEvent vs  Danga::Socket due to
>>> the fact that AnyEvent with EV as underlaying event lib looks very fast
>>> from the internet source ;-)
>>
>> Matt was (I'm guessing) testing a load that's artificial to anyone who's 
>> not just archiving spam from a spam trap.  For the rest of us by far most 
>> of the resources go to the various spam filtering stuff, so the performance 
>> will be fine.
>>
>> More important is the ease of use of the APIs, the general eco system etc.  
>> On those AnyEvent wins (in my opinion).
>
> Sorry yeah I think I have it working, but our work data centre is down
> right now so I can't get at the files :-(
>
> Will email the latest ones here when I get the chance.

Thanks, I'am quite interested.

> And yes it was slower than Danga::Socket (despite EV being "fast",
> Danga::Socket hits directly to epoll, with very little API in the way,
> so ends up being faster) but Ask's point stands - there's more dev
> done around AnyEvent on CPAN.

Ok. I will try to get the runbench2, in eg directory of AnyEvent,
working with Danga::Socket and try to compare.