Re: Any point in retaining packaging/rpm/files/qpsmtpd-plugins-file-connection?

Richard Siddall wrote:
> 
> I just noticed that 0.84 includes plugins/logging/file, which is
> another version of Peter J. Holzer and Devin Carraway's file logging
> plugin, similar to
> packaging/rpm/files/qpsmtpd-plugins-file-connection.
> 
> I can't figure out which one is better, or newer.  If we could
> definitively say plugins/logging/file was better, I'd argue for
> deleting the file under packaging and fixing up the rpm specfile.

A quick comparison shows that plugins/logging/file is newer, with
cleaned up code and better documentation.  It is definitely based on
qpsmtpd-plugins-file-connection.