Re: parsing behavior of a subrule without/with a repetition specifier

Akio asked:

   > more specifically, is the parsing behavior of
   > 
   > 	program: statement
   > 
   > equivalent to the counterpart of 
   > 
   > 	program: statement(1)
   > 
   > EXCEPT for their resulting data structures (former: a scalar; latter: a
   > reference to an array) or something else?

They are *supposed* to be identical, except for returned data structure.
Did you find some other sense in which they were not?

Damian