Re: Extract / Insert text files
[email protected] (John Porter) Tue, 7 Mar 2000 17:27:19 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.scripts |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
John Nolan wrote: > > That being said, however, I do not think it's the right way to > implement tarballs for the CPAN script archive. > > I think this would be an appropriate time for the mailing list > maintainer and/or the CPAN script archive maintainer to weigh in > with an opinion. I am neither, but I'll weigh in anyway. :-) MO: shar is the right paradigm. The downside is that shar is not portable. Perl is, of course; so it makes sense to make a perl equivalent of the shar utility. And it, and the scripts it generates, should not depend on anything other than a standard distribution of perl. Perl has uu*code built in, so that should take care of any binaries. Apart from that, a more-or-less straight port of shar to perl would be the way to go... IMHO. OTOH, MakeMaker is certainly capable of handling the installation and configuration of scripts, as much as of modules. The downside is that not all machines have a compatible make. -- John Porter Papa! Es un gringo en la calle con su coche!