Re: new script category?

Rich Bowen wrote:
> I personally have little opinion on this. Although I think that 'device'
> is sufficiently generic as to be meaningless to most folk, I think that
> within a certain circle (ie, folks used to Unix) it may have a more
> specific meaning. This is my only concern with the name.

I dunno.  Categorizing scripts is a much tougher job than categorizing
modules, which is tough enough.

I think the overarching rule should be, If a user had need for a
script like this, where would she most likely go looking for it?

Given that, a top-level category like "Device" might not be bad,
although maybe "Hardware Interface" would be even better.

Category names are just English expressions, right?

-- 
John Douglas Porter

I no longer love the color of your sweaters.