Re: New script category!
[email protected] (Rich Bowen) Tue, 5 Feb 2002 06:38:14 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | perl.scripts |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Clemens Giegerich wrote: > Hi all, > > I didn't get any respons of my last e-mail (some weeks ago). I request a > new script category for my perltk script mkFilter.pl: > > mkFilter.pl is a script with GUI (perltk) for testing perl regular > expressions, filtering input data (text) and generating template > scripts. You can use the script like a debugger for a single regular > expression. You can't step into an expression but you can change the > expression and see immediately the change on the input string and all > auto set perl variables. Input separator can be changed so it can also > be used to work on structured data. The resulting expression can be > written to a template script (including loop, ...), applied inplace or > coppied to the clipboard. ... > > My first request for a new category was Text::Filter. > Another (perhaps bettter) idea from a reply of my request was Regex::. > Or both? > > Any comments? I seem to recall that there were a number of responses to it, some discussion of the relative merits of the "Text" top-level-category, and some other random discussion. Personally, I think that the name mkFilter is sufficiently undescriptive that folks will have a hard time recognizing from its name what it is, and so are likely to go past it in a listing. My opinion, for what it's worth, is that "Regex" might be a more appropriate category for this particular program, if I am correctly understanding what it does. -- Rich Bowen - [email protected] .... and another brother out of his mind, and another brother out at New York (not the same, though it might appear so) Somebody's Luggage (Charles Dickens)