Re: a new script category: Scientific
[email protected] (Vlado Keselj) Wed, 21 May 2003 07:48:12 -0300 (ADT)
| Newsgroups | perl.scripts |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think that category Text would be better. If you take a look at Perl modules, the most appropriate prefix would be Text::. "Scientific" is too general and not text-processing related. Vlado On Tue, 20 May 2003, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > I uploaded a script, ngram.pl (now at version 1.45), for which > I couldn't think any better category than 'Scientific'. (It's > kind of like of statistics, but applied to a very specific data, > so I opted for a more generic category.) > > -- > Jarkko Hietaniemi <[email protected]> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special > biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen >