AW: new category "VersionControl : ClearCase (tm)"
[email protected] (Schuett Thomas EXT) Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:57:31 +0100
| Newsgroups | perl.scripts |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <76592C4D3DA1AC4FB8424084D10D31A8061150DE@mchh2c4e.mchh.siemens.de> |
Hello Kurt, >> I want to contribute a perl script for the versioning system >> ClearCase, so I want to suggest the new script category >> "VersionControl : ClearCase (tm)" > I think that your proposal is very sensible. Hmm, so what does this mean? Yes or no, and why? >> As ClearCase is a trademark, I wonder, if it is sufficient >> to add an (tm) behind it? > I don't believe that the (tm) is necessary or appropriate. Even better, that is something I actually like to hear :-) BTW: I realized, that if someone wants to write a perl prog, and needs some isolatable functionality, he of course would have a look at CPAN. But if someone, say, uses ClearCase, why at all he should look into the CPAN scripts area? So I wonder if the scripts area is doomed to "not work" by fundamental reasons. Are there any usage statistics confirming or rejecting this theorie? Thomas