Re: Script Classification ?

Rich Bowen wrote:
> "Kurt D. Starsinic" wrote:
> > 
> ...
> >     I think that Version_Control is more suitable.  People use RCS
> > and other revision control systems for other things beside software.
> > If there's strong feeling for putting it under a Software_Development
> > hierarchy, then I would favor dual-categorization (e.g., Version_Control
> > _and_ Software_Development/Version_Control).
> 
> OK, makes sense to me. I only use VC for software. But, now that you
> mention it, there's a strong argument for doing it with config files and
> a variety of other things. Let's go with Version_Control rather than the
> 40-character monstrosity! ;-)

Um, what about "Configuration_Management", which is a bit broader, and
whose abbreviation is nearly universally understood?

-- 
John Porter