Re: Script Classification ?

[email protected] ("Kurt D. Starsinic")
Newsgroups perl.scripts
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 10:29:52AM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Norbert Gruener wrote:
> > 
> ...
> > >     I think that Version_Control is more suitable.  People use RCS
> > > and other revision control systems for other things beside software.
> > > If there's strong feeling for putting it under a Software_Development
> > > hierarchy, then I would favor dual-categorization (e.g., Version_Control
> > > _and_ Software_Development/Version_Control).
> > 
> > I just wanted to ask about the present status of my inquiry.  Is there a
> > final agreement and if so what is it ?
> ...
> 
> I thought that we resolved this, but apparently we never did.
> Version_Control had the most support when we discussed this. Let's go
> ahead and get that category created for Norbert.

    Done and done.

    Peace,
* Kurt Starsinic ([email protected]) --------- Technical Specialist *
| `October.  This is one of the peculiarly dangerous months to speculate in |
|  stocks in.  The others are July, January, September, April, November,    |
|  May, March, June, December, August, and February.'  --  Mark Twain       |
Institute for Scientific Information                   http://www.isinet.com/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.