Re: Legacy scripts

[email protected] ("Kurt D. Starsinic")
Newsgroups perl.scripts
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 09:35:01AM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I looked through the "legacy" scripts, and found very few that seemed to
> be worthwhile keeping around. There were also a number that I simply did
> not understand, and so cannot comment inteligently on. Are they being
> kept simply because the CPAN is C, or is there some historical reason -
> perhaps a historical reason that would be better served by giving them
> to history.perl.com rather than mirroring them on hundreds of sites
> around the globe?

    Some have suggested that the legacy scripts should remain for
historical reasons.  I can't say that I concur, but IIRC, some
serious Perl old-timers had strong feelings that those scripts
shouldn't be removed.

> The "DATE and TIME conversion/manipulation" section, for example, were
> all obsoleted by the various Time::* and Date::* modules. They are
> interesting, because they show how one might accomplish these same
> things by hand, but they are not particularly useful, because one is
> unlikely to need to accomplish them by hand.
> 
> Ditto for the Database section.
> 
> I think that it would be a worthwhile exercise to go through all of them
> and figure out which ones were worth keeping, and move them to the main
> scripts archive. And the ones that were deemed not worth keeping,
> perhaps it would be worthwhile to demonstrate an alternative way of
> doing the same thing, and present the old way and the new way together
> somehow, with some commentary of why the old way seemed like a good idea
> at the time - apparently, mostly because we were still using Perl 4 at
> the time.

    I think it would be terrific if people would adopt the good legacy
scripts and sponsor them in the new scripts area.  As to the rest of
your proposal, I encourage you to be more specific.

    Peace,
* Kurt Starsinic ([email protected]) --------- Technical Specialist *
|       `People keep pretending they can make things deeply                 |
|        hierarchical, categorizable and sequential when they can't.        |
|        Everything is deeply intertwingled.' -- Ted Nelson                 |
Institute for Scientific Information                   http://www.isinet.com/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.