Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list

>>>>> "Graham" == Graham Barr <[email protected]> writes:
    Graham> But you decided to change the result of the discussion. It
    Graham> is not very diplomatic to discuss something then change
    Graham> things because you do not agree.

Not sure if you're refering to Time::*, FreezeThaw or both, so I'll
assume both.

FreezeThaw remains on the list because a well-respected book speaks
about it in positive tones, specificly in comparison to Storable.  If
it comes to pass that the author of said book actually sees FreezeThaw
& Storable as quite interchangeable then I'll remove FreezeThaw.  If
said author still differentiates between the two them I'm inclined to
leave both; if only to avoid the "why isn't <blah> in the SDK"
questions.

In the case of the Time::* modules, I originally, without checking the
modules myself, interpreted a post on your part as sugesting that
equivalent functionality already existed; you corrected my
misinterpretation so I left both modules in the list.  Having since
reviewd the modules myself, I feel that the SDK may need one but does
not need both.  I would like, however, for voices other than yours and
mine to join this discussion before a conclusion is reached about
which if any module to include.

Is that more reasonable?

-- 
Stephen

"There are those who call me... Tim"