Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list

Graham Barr writes:
> Likewise but there has been a lot of silence. Mainly I suspect due to
> this list does not have the diversity of users to decide on a complete
> list of modules for an SDK IMO.

True, but so be it.  We make the best decisions we can, and rely on
experience to provide the rest.  I figure that once SDK 1 is out the
door, we'll get plenty of feedback on what worked and what didn't for
SDK 2.

I think it's better to be conservative and omit possibly redundant
modules.  We can always add them in SDK2, but it'll be hard to remove
a module once it's in.

This probably argues against FreezeThaw, unless Stephen's extralistual
probings turn up evidence to the contrary.  And I don't see his
seeking external input as defeating the democratic process or anything
like that.  Stephen obviously feels this is important.  I don't even
think he's bound by our 'votes' (such as the apathy is, voting seems
an optimistic word to use :-).  As SDKing for the first release, he
can put WWW:Pr0n::Search::L33t in if he wants.  I just trust his
judgement so that it won't :-)

Nat