Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list
[email protected] ("David Grove") Mon, 15 May 2000 21:47:02 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.sdk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00a701bfbee1$03b202a0$0700a8c0@panther> |
Personally, I could never get freeze-thaw to work, whereas Storable has become central to much of my work because it was straightforward and worked the first time. It is a also a superset of freeze-thaw, iirc. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Zander" <[email protected]> To: "Nathan Torkington" <[email protected]> Cc: "Graham Barr" <[email protected]>; "Stephen Zander" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 9:18 PM Subject: Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list > >>>>> "Nathan" == Nathan Torkington <[email protected]> writes: > Nathan> This probably argues against FreezeThaw, unless Stephen's > Nathan> extralistual probings turn up evidence to the contrary. > > To wit: > > >>>>> "Damian" == Damian Conway <[email protected]> writes: > > There is some debate within the perl-sdk list about the value of > > FreezeThaw when Storable is available, so I'd like someone one > > with your knowledge for an unbiased opinion. > > Damian> If I had to choose between them, I'd choose FreezeThaw: > Damian> it's encoding scheme is more efficient and it's handling > Damian> of blessed data is considerably more sophisticated. But as > Damian> I haven't used either extensively in recent times, I can't > Damian> speak for their relative speed or reliability. > > I'd hope that right about now someone other than Graham or myself > starts doing some talking. > > -- > Stephen > > "A duck!" >