Re: All's fair (in) love and the sdk list

On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 09:15:56AM -0500, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
> Graham Barr [[email protected]] quoth:
> *>
> *>Basically if we don't attempt to get even the intial module set riht,
> *>or even close. Then the SDK is just going to grow to be a tarball of CPAN.
> 
> I think running a build and sending it out for feedback will get this
> working far faster than playing tennis.

No as I said in other mails people will only report what is missing.
But as soo as you let people have it, even a pre-release, they won't
like it if you remove things.

> Building the SDK will also bring
> out potential issues like how we intend to get them all to build properly,
> test and install.

Well that is a must anyway.

> Making the list of modules is the easy part and it's
> only been close to 2 years in the making.

I think that goes to show it is not easy. Coming up with "a" liist is easy,
but getting the right list is harder.

Graham.